Two Technologies, One Purpose
GC has been the reference standard for 50+ years. PAS is the 4th-generation technology making continuous multi-gas monitoring practical. Understanding their tradeoffs is essential for specifying a DGA strategy.
How GC Works
Oil sample → vacuum extraction → carrier gas → chromatographic column (separation by retention time) → FID (hydrocarbons) + TCD (H₂/O₂/N₂). Gold standard: the only technology recognized in every major standard (IEC 60567, ASTM D3612, IEEE C57.104, CIGRE TB 771). Lab GC achieves <1 ppm detection with ±5% accuracy.
How PAS Works
Membrane permeation → tunable laser at gas-specific IR wavelength → photoacoustic signal proportional to concentration (S = k × α × P × C). No carrier gas, no columns, no consumables. R² >0.95 vs GC in field validation. Full PAS guide →
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Criterion | GC (Lab) | PAS (Online) |
|---|---|---|
| Reference Method? | Yes | Field-validated (R²>0.95) |
| Gases | 7–9 + O₂/N₂ | 9 + moisture |
| C₂H₂ Detection | <0.5 ppm | 0.1 ppm |
| Data Points/Year | 1 | 365–8,760 |
| Consumables | $1,200/yr carrier gas + columns | Zero |
| Maintenance | 4–12 visits/year | <5 min/year visual |
| Operator Skill | Trained chemist | None (automated) |
| 10-Year TCO | $35K–55K (lab service) | $12.5K–23K |
| Best For | Reference, compliance, disputes | Continuous monitoring, early warning |
10-Year TCO Breakdown
| Cost | Lab GC | Online GC | PAS (DGA-900) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardware | N/A | $35K–55K | $12K–22K |
| Installation | N/A | $3K–5K | $500–1K |
| 10yr Consumables | $30K–50K | $25K–40K | $0 |
| 10yr Labor | $5K | $45K–90K | $0 |
| Total 10-Year | $35K–55K | $80K–150K | $12.5K–23K |